Re: sarge?
fre, 30.04.2004 kl. 20.25 skrev Paul Johnson:
> Kenneth Macdoald Karlsen <ken@fiona-victor.com> writes:
>
> > I agree with many of the posters on slashdot. A distribution that uses a
> > lot of focus on licencing and fanatic disputes about how the world ought
> > to be will probably end up as "something funny that was once ago". It
> > seems to me that foucus now is to support 11 architectures (many of them
> > are old) in sync and to remove/downgrade support for modern
> > archtectures/ hardware. That sounds not like a sustainable environment
> > for me.
>
> How about instead of grousing about how Debian sucks because the
> release cycle is so long, *do something about it*. Start here:
> http://www.debian.org/devel/
I will do something about it and that is to stop using Debian. If i will
develop, it would sertainly not be within Debian the community, I can
assure you of that.
I have used Debian for 3 years and my conclusion is to move from
fantacyland to the real world, by that I mean the dynamic, rapid
changing world of IT.
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: sarge?
- From: "Monique Y. Mudama" <spam@bounceswoosh.org>
- References:
- sarge?
- From: "Axel Green" <axeltabs@hotmail.com>
- Re: sarge?
- From: Tim <tim.hoebeek@vub.ac.be>
- Re: sarge?
- From: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>
- Re: sarge?
- From: Nicos Gollan <gtdev@spearhead.de>
- Re: sarge?
- From: Katipo <katipo@weavers-web.org>
- Re: sarge?
- From: Kenneth Macdoald Karlsen <ken@fiona-victor.com>
- Re: sarge?
- From: Paul Johnson <baloo@ursine.ca>