Re: xlibmesa-gl1-dri-mach64
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 08:40:29AM -0500, Chris Metzler wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Mar 2004 11:52:31 +0100
> David Baron <d_baron@012.net.il> wrote:
> >
> > This much I realize.
> >
> > That it might not want to keep the "xmesa-glu" and such, I can
> > understand. Guarddog?, The qt library?
>
Guarddog depends on xlibmesa-gl | libgl1, IIRC xlibmesa-gl1-dri-mach64
provides xlibmesa3-gl and maybe xlibmesa4-gl but not xlibmesa-gl (I
changed that so I am not sure what the original package said)
As for qt (I thing its the dev, right) IIRC it depends on
xlibmesa-gl-dev which depends on a specific version of xlibmesa-gl
which is removed. Forcing this does work ok since the replacement
library does provide all the hooks, I just hacked the packages though
(also upgraded to cvs version, which should be upgraded again ;-)
> To use just one example, a simple visit to packages.debian.org would show
> you that guarddog in unstable depends on xlibmesa-gl. If the package
> you're installing requires the removal of xlibmesa-gl, it's also going
> to require the removal of everything that depends on it.
>
>
> > The only "foreign" sources I have in sources.lst are Daenziger for this
> > dri stuff but I do not believe this is theirs--they offer sources for a
> > drm-mach64 which I cannot get to work and will not compile at all for
> > 2.6 kernels.
>
> Well, I have no idea where xlibmesa-gl1-dri-mach64 is from. I just know
> that it's not from Debian. p.d.o doesn't know anything about it.
>
> -c
>
> --
> Chris Metzler cmetzler@speakeasy.snip-me.net
> (remove "snip-me." to email)
>
> "As a child I understood how to give; I have forgotten this grace since I
> have become civilized." - Chief Luther Standing Bear
>
Reply to: