On Mon, 15 Mar 2004 11:52:31 +0100 David Baron <d_baron@012.net.il> wrote: > > This much I realize. > > That it might not want to keep the "xmesa-glu" and such, I can > understand. Guarddog?, The qt library? To use just one example, a simple visit to packages.debian.org would show you that guarddog in unstable depends on xlibmesa-gl. If the package you're installing requires the removal of xlibmesa-gl, it's also going to require the removal of everything that depends on it. > The only "foreign" sources I have in sources.lst are Daenziger for this > dri stuff but I do not believe this is theirs--they offer sources for a > drm-mach64 which I cannot get to work and will not compile at all for > 2.6 kernels. Well, I have no idea where xlibmesa-gl1-dri-mach64 is from. I just know that it's not from Debian. p.d.o doesn't know anything about it. -c -- Chris Metzler cmetzler@speakeasy.snip-me.net (remove "snip-me." to email) "As a child I understood how to give; I have forgotten this grace since I have become civilized." - Chief Luther Standing Bear
Attachment:
pgp5ynU43hfC2.pgp
Description: PGP signature