Re: 56K Modems

[Arnt Karlsen <arnt@c2i.net>]

On Mon, 5 Jan 2004 09:17:50 +0800, 
Katipo <katipo@weavers-web.org> wrote in message 
<[🔎] 20040105091750.6967a2e9.katipo@weavers-web.org>:

> On Mon, 5 Jan 2004 01:16:24 +0100
> Arnt Karlsen <arnt@c2i.net> wrote:
> 
> <Big snip>
> 
> > > s/US/UK/ In practical terms, if the smoothing can cope with 50Hz,
> > > it will cope with 60Hz; it'll be in the adapter not the modem
> > > anyway; and it's generally designed on the basis of "1000uF is big
> > > enough":-)
> > 
> > .."oh, I thought mF meant micro Farad?".  ;-)
> 
> No, uF is microfarad.

..uhmmm, correct. ;-)  In your average yawdrop presentations 
of Linux to Windroids, have you ever demonstrated consistent 
ping times in the one-digit nano-second range?  ;-)

> <Another massive snip>
> 
> I've also discovered that placing a tri-config. across the outlet
> i.e., positive to negative, neg. to earth, earth to positive, of three
> .0047uF greencaps does a lot toward smoothing out fluctuations of all
> sorts. Regards,

..and no sparks.  Sissy.   ;-)

-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.