[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: gaim problem



Scarletdown wrote:
Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. wrote:

panda wrote:

Hi,

I am not very sure I should be sending this on this list. Please tell me if I am wrong.

I installed gaim ( version 0.72 ) using aptitude. It shows my contacts on YM and MSN but the moment I click on one of them ( off or online ) gaim shuts down. I would send in a bug report but the message asks me if I am using the most recent version which I am not ( 0.74 )



How did you manage to get .72 (even using aptitude)? I can't find any packages higher then .62 (from unstable).

As for the problem, I have the same problem with the official Yahoo client so I too am interested in the solution.


Checking for new version with apt-get -t unstable does not find anything.


I'm running 0.72 just fine.  I got it from here:

ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/unstable/main/binary-i386/



W: GPG error: http://download.kde.org stable Release: Unknown error executing gpgv W: GPG error: http://mirrors.kernel.org stable Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY B629A24C38C6029A W: GPG error: http://ftp.us.debian.org stable Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY B629A24C38C6029A W: GPG error: http://ftp.debian.org stable Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY B629A24C38C6029A W: GPG error: http://non-us.debian.org stable/non-US Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY B629A24C38C6029A
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems

That's after running apt-get update about three dozen times.
--
Joseph A. Nagy, Jr.
Student at Motlow State Community College
Political Activist Extrodinaire
The only fallacy is the inaction on our part to stave off the worst of horrors, the stripping of personal freedom.



Reply to: