Re: "Red Hat recommends Windows for consumers"

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: "Red Hat recommends Windows for consumers"
From: Tom <tb.31020.nospam@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 19:58:05 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 20031106035805.GA8893@comcast.net>
Mail-followup-to: debian-user@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] E1AHao6-0002aO-00@blount.mail.mindspring.net>
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.58.0311051812570.947@localhost.localdomain> <[🔎] 01ab01c3a3f9$171e6d00$835a22d0@blackgold> <[🔎] slrnbqj5au.7ah.spam@home.bounceswoosh.org> <[🔎] E1AHao6-0002aO-00@blount.mail.mindspring.net>

On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 10:27:32PM -0500, Mike Mueller wrote:
> Mr. RH CEO tastes sour grapes because IBM dropped US$50M into Novell 
> effectively choosing SuSE's dance card over the RH's.  Mr. RH CEO peed into 
> the OSS well. He should have kept his mouth shut. Then again he might be 
> positioning RH for sale to M$.

I thought RH and IBM were tight; RH was essentially IBM's Linux support 
department (not literally, just sort of).

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: "Red Hat recommends Windows for consumers"
  - From: "David Palmer." <davidpalmer@westnet.com.au>

References:
- "Red Hat recommends Windows for consumers"
  - From: Wolfgang Pfeiffer <roto@gmx.net>
- Re: "Red Hat recommends Windows for consumers"
  - From: "Hoyt Bailey" <hoyt13@wiredok.com>
- Re: "Red Hat recommends Windows for consumers"
  - From: "Monique Y. Herman" <spam@bounceswoosh.org>
- Re: "Red Hat recommends Windows for consumers"
  - From: Mike Mueller <linux-support@earthlink.net>

Prev by Date: Re: setting hardware clock from NIST
Next by Date: new user question about stable branch
Previous by thread: Re: "Red Hat recommends Windows for consumers"
Next by thread: Re: "Red Hat recommends Windows for consumers"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread