Re: Fwd: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003 16:51:09 +0100,
Clive Menzies <clive@clivemenzies.co.uk> wrote in message
<[🔎] 20030915155109.GN1849@apollo>:
> Hi David
>
> I'm sending this to the list because my message to you bounced.
..Shri's NetRail list announcement should come any minute now,
I'm #2 enlisted. ;-)
>
> ----- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System
> <Mailer-Daemon@clivemenzies.co.uk> -----
>
> > To: clive@clivemenzies.co.uk
> > From: Mail Delivery System <Mailer-Daemon@clivemenzies.co.uk>
> > Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 16:06:55 +0100
> > Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
> >
> > This message was created automatically by mail delivery software
> > (Exim).
> >
> > A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
> > recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es)
> > failed:
> >
> > davidpalmer@westnet.com.au
> > SMTP error from remote mailer after RCPT
> > TO:<davidpalmer@westnet.com.au>: host mulgara.westnet.com.au
> > [203.10.1.6]: 504 <apollo>: Helo command rejected: need
> > fully-qualified hostname
> >
> > ------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers.
> > ------
> >
> > Return-path: <clive@clivemenzies.co.uk>
> > Received: from clive by apollo with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
> > id 19yuvm-0001vB-00; Mon, 15 Sep 2003 16:06:22 +0100
> > Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 16:06:22 +0100
> > From: Clive Menzies <clive@clivemenzies.co.uk>
> > To: David Palmer <davidpalmer@westnet.com.au>
> > Cc: Maggie Dusnic <maggie@clivemenzies.co.uk>
> > Subject: Re: British Rail Project.
> > Message-ID: <20030915150622.GL1849@apollo>
> > References: <20030913220630.CB7E83F64B@mulgara.westnet.com.au>
> > Mime-Version: 1.0
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> > Content-Disposition: inline
> > In-Reply-To: <20030913220630.CB7E83F64B@mulgara.westnet.com.au>
> > User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
> >
> > On (14/09/03 06:20), David Palmer wrote:
> > > Let me know what is happening with this project, as I am rather
> > > interested in it. There has been talk on the list of establishing
> > > a separate list for the project, but I've heard nothing further.
> > > I would agree that we have the neccesary expertise on the Debian
> > > list. At this stage the only reservation I have is the staff on
> > > the ground, especially for the initial installation.
> > > I feel, also, that a lot of reservations that some of the others
> > > may be experiencing would be overcome with a reasonable donation
> > > to the Debian project from the initial contractual agreement. This
> > > would also ensure the resource reference for any ongoing hiccups
> > > along the way. Perhaps with lesser ongoing payments (if we could
> > > arrange for the Debian project to be a tax deductible entity, this
> > > would be good as well). A lot of Pigeons' reservations would be
> > > overcome, I feel, if he got a bit of money in his pocket, and a
> > > free rail pass, in association with his new position as one of the
> > > new network maintenance contractors. LOL. He definitely knows his
> > > way around Debian and trains. I'm sure that rail staff would
> > > appreciate those aspects of him. Regards,
> >
> > Hi David
> >
> > I've invited people via the list to send me details of their
> > experience and particular interest in contributing to the project.
> > I would then ask my partner, Maggie, to put up a webpage with those
> > details together with a brief synopsis of where we are and what we
> > are trying to achieve and then refer people on the list to the page
> > in the hope that we can get more interest locally (UK).
> >
> > Separately, last Thursday Arnt Karlsen wrote that he has asked Shri
> > Shrikumar to set up a mailing list; I've not heard anything further.
> >
> > So if you want to send me details as above, you could be one of the
> > first to go up and we'll take it from there ;)
> >
> > Regards
> >
> >
> > Clive
>
> ----- End forwarded message -----
>
>
--
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
Scenarios always come in sets of three:
best case, worst case, and just in case.
Reply to: