Fwd: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
Hi David
I'm sending this to the list because my message to you bounced.
----- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System <Mailer-Daemon@clivemenzies.co.uk> -----
> To: clive@clivemenzies.co.uk
> From: Mail Delivery System <Mailer-Daemon@clivemenzies.co.uk>
> Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 16:06:55 +0100
> Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
>
> This message was created automatically by mail delivery software (Exim).
>
> A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
> recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
>
> davidpalmer@westnet.com.au
> SMTP error from remote mailer after RCPT TO:<davidpalmer@westnet.com.au>:
> host mulgara.westnet.com.au [203.10.1.6]: 504 <apollo>:
> Helo command rejected: need fully-qualified hostname
>
> ------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------
>
> Return-path: <clive@clivemenzies.co.uk>
> Received: from clive by apollo with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
> id 19yuvm-0001vB-00; Mon, 15 Sep 2003 16:06:22 +0100
> Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 16:06:22 +0100
> From: Clive Menzies <clive@clivemenzies.co.uk>
> To: David Palmer <davidpalmer@westnet.com.au>
> Cc: Maggie Dusnic <maggie@clivemenzies.co.uk>
> Subject: Re: British Rail Project.
> Message-ID: <20030915150622.GL1849@apollo>
> References: <20030913220630.CB7E83F64B@mulgara.westnet.com.au>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> In-Reply-To: <20030913220630.CB7E83F64B@mulgara.westnet.com.au>
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
>
> On (14/09/03 06:20), David Palmer wrote:
> > Let me know what is happening with this project, as I am rather interested in
> > it. There has been talk on the list of establishing a separate list for the
> > project, but I've heard nothing further.
> > I would agree that we have the neccesary expertise on the Debian list. At
> > this stage the only reservation I have is the staff on the ground, especially
> > for the initial installation.
> > I feel, also, that a lot of reservations that some of the others may be
> > experiencing would be overcome with a reasonable donation to the Debian
> > project from the initial contractual agreement. This would also ensure the
> > resource reference for any ongoing hiccups along the way. Perhaps with lesser
> > ongoing payments (if we could arrange for the Debian project to be a tax
> > deductible entity, this would be good as well).
> > A lot of Pigeons' reservations would be overcome, I feel, if he got a bit of
> > money in his pocket, and a free rail pass, in association with his new
> > position as one of the new network maintenance contractors. LOL.
> > He definitely knows his way around Debian and trains. I'm sure that rail
> > staff would appreciate those aspects of him.
> > Regards,
>
> Hi David
>
> I've invited people via the list to send me details of their experience
> and particular interest in contributing to the project. I would then
> ask my partner, Maggie, to put up a webpage with those details together
> with a brief synopsis of where we are and what we are trying to achieve
> and then refer people on the list to the page in the hope that we can get
> more interest locally (UK).
>
> Separately, last Thursday Arnt Karlsen wrote that he has asked Shri
> Shrikumar to set up a mailing list; I've not heard anything further.
>
> So if you want to send me details as above, you could be one of the
> first to go up and we'll take it from there ;)
>
> Regards
>
>
> Clive
----- End forwarded message -----
Reply to: