also sprach Juri Haberland <juri@koschikode.com> [2003.08.21.1605 +0200]: > > Right, but while I had zero dataloss on ext3 filesystems so far, > > I have been screwed over by reiserfs a couple of times. > > I didn't suggest that you actually *use* reiserfs, but if you're doing > benchmarks you should do them with the same filesystems, or else your > numbers are meaningless. Right. > > The disk on the fast machine is master to a slave disk. > > The first disk in the RAID is (unfortunately) master to a slave > > CD-ROM, which is, however, unused. > > Ok. I just saw, that I could have gathered that information from your > other mail - sorry about that. Uh, how? hdb was never mentioned. No problem, I am the one asking for help here. > Well, I don't know about ext3, but my RAID5 device, which I created > without any special commandline parameters, looks like this: > > md7 : active raid5 hdg9[2] hde1[1] hda9[0] > 160086272 blocks level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [3/3] [UUU] How'd you make it? What does your /etc/raidtab look like? > I'd say, fix your DMA problems and your RAID5 should fly. You got it! -- Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them! .''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org> : :' : proud Debian developer, admin, and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
Attachment:
pgpV5kuZks4gi.pgp
Description: PGP signature