Re: mozilla vs. mozilla-firebird

To: "Stefan Waidele jun." <Stefan@Waidele.net>
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: mozilla vs. mozilla-firebird
From: Ed Lawson <elawson@grizzy.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 14:40:54 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 3F451236.30001@grizzy.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 3F450CAA.3090206@Waidele.net>
References: <20030819213830.BCB281FBF0@murphy.debian.org> <[🔎] 3F42B63B.9000400@yahoo.co.uk> <[🔎] 3F450CAA.3090206@Waidele.net>

Stefan Waidele jun. wrote:


Thunderbird is for E-Mail,

It is a great E-Mail client.  However, no packages for it in unstable.
At least not under mail and web packages.

Ed Lawson

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: mozilla vs. mozilla-firebird
  - From: Brian Stults <bstults@crim.ufl.edu>

References:
- Re: mozilla vs. mozilla-firebird
  - From: John Stevenson <objectcore@yahoo.co.uk>
- Re: mozilla vs. mozilla-firebird
  - From: "Stefan Waidele jun." <Stefan@Waidele.net>

Prev by Date: Hard Drive Crash Recovery
Next by Date: Setting up the parport
Previous by thread: Re: mozilla vs. mozilla-firebird
Next by thread: Re: mozilla vs. mozilla-firebird
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread