Re: rms on debian

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: rms on debian
From: Paul Johnson <baloo@ursine.ca>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 20:28:49 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 20030821032849.GA6048@ursine.ca>
Mail-followup-to: debian-user@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 6053.1061340198@mixed>
References: <[🔎] 1061093886.711.54.camel@debian.potter> <[🔎] 20030817151942.GB832@flexiblekitten.localdomain> <[🔎] 20030819223159.GA4084@matchmail.com> <[🔎] 6053.1061340198@mixed>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 08:43:18PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> So it's `GNU/LinEx GNU/Linux' instead of `Debian GNU/Linux'.

Wouldn't it be GNU/LinEx GNU/LiGNUx?

- -- 
 .''`.     Paul Johnson <baloo@ursine.ca>
: :'  :    proud Debian admin and user
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fix a system
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/RDxxsClmdIs2Ki8RAimQAJ0asa0OLR5mqoQKheKRB16exbJpwgCeOnNj
mjDxJl1k/qDTx+MjQvTJ+cw=
=2GN8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply to:

References:
- rms on debian
  - From: Kevin Mark <kevin@localhost>
- Re: rms on debian
  - From: tom_massey@pacific.net.au (Tom Massey)
- Re: rms on debian
  - From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
- Re: rms on debian
  - From: Peter S Galbraith <p.galbraith@globetrotter.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Fetchmail stuck on bad messages
Next by Date: Re: Best way to upgrade a single app
Previous by thread: Re: rms on debian
Next by thread: Re: rms on debian
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread