Re: [OT]: CVS replacement
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 11:35:11AM -0600, Wesley J Landaker wrote:
> On Friday 08 August 2003 8:18 am, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 06:53:15AM -0700, Dave Carrigan wrote:
> > >
> > > Not all your history, sadly. Branches and tags are lost.
> >
> > Is this still true? Recent versions of cvs2svn claim to have fixed
> > this.
>
> I hadn't actually tried it with branches since 0.25; I know *lots* of
> stuff was fixed in cvs2svn in 0.26.
Based on the Subversion list discussions, they are close to supporting
branches and tags for cvs2svn, but it wasn't included in 0.26.
--
Jamin W. Collins
Remember, root always has a loaded gun. Don't run around with it unless
you absolutely need it. -- Vineet Kumar
Reply to: