Re: nfs versus reiser?
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 10:34:38AM -0400, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 05:07:22PM -0700, Mark Ferlatte wrote:
> > email@example.com said on Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 05:53:21PM -0400:
> > > Serves me right for asking a negative question. I presume this meand Yes, a
> > > reiserfs can be nfs-remote-mounted.
> > :) I use reiserfs via NFS faily often.
> And I have got it working too, butnot quite to my satisfaction. I will
> have to experiment a little more. But I it does not appear to be a
> reiserfs problem.
> The following fstab entry works on topoi
> /dev/hdc1 /reiseroffsite reiserfs defaults 1 2
> The following one does not:
> /dev/hdc1 /reiseroffsite reiserfs noauto,user 0 0
> So it has to do with the context of the mount. Anyway, having it
> automatically mounted at boot is not acceptable in the long term
> because it is a dismountable volume, and, in fact, most of the time
> it sits on a shelf serving as a backup.
I will have to try noauto without user.