[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: nfs versus reiser?



On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 10:34:38AM -0400, hashi@pooq.com wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 05:07:22PM -0700, Mark Ferlatte wrote:
> > hashi@pooq.com said on Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 05:53:21PM -0400:
> > > Serves me right for asking a negative question.  I presume this meand Yes, a
> > > reiserfs can be nfs-remote-mounted.
> >  
> > :)  I use reiserfs via NFS faily often.
> 
> And I have got it working too, butnot quite to my satisfaction.  I will
> have to experiment a little more.  But I it does not appear to be a
> reiserfs problem.
> 
> The following fstab entry works on topoi
> /dev/hdc1       /reiseroffsite  reiserfs  defaults    1    2
> 
> The following one does not:
> /dev/hdc1       /reiseroffsite  reiserfs  noauto,user 0   0
> 
> So it has to do with the context of the mount.  Anyway, having it
> automatically mounted at boot is not acceptable in the long term
> because it is a dismountable volume, and, in fact, most of the time
> it sits on a shelf serving as a backup.

I will have to try noauto without user.

-- hendrik



Reply to: