nfs versus reiser?

[hashi@pooq.com]

Can a reiserfs not be nfs-remote-mounted?
Or am I doing something else wrong?

I have a reiser filesystem mounted on a machine called topoi.
>From a machine called lovesong I wish to nfs-mount this remote file system.
But all I get is 

[root@lovesong hendrik]# mount /reiseroffsite/
mount: topoi:/reiseroffsite failed, reason given by server: Permission denied
[root@lovesong hendrik]# 

Another filesystem, which happens to be an ext2 filesystem, works just fine.
Permissions on the various directories are identical between the two file systems.  Even the /etc/exports lines are identical (except for the names of the file systems, of course.

Here are the relevant lines from /etc/exports on topoi:

/home2  172.25.1.2(rw,no_root_squash,map_identity) 172.25.1.3(rw,no_root_squash,map_identity) 172.25.1.4(rw,no_root_squash,map_identity)
/reiseroffsite  172.25.1.2(rw,no_root_squash,map_identity) 172.25.1.3(rw,no_root_squash,map_identity) 172.25.1.4(rw,no_root_squash,map_identity)

And the relevane lines from /etc/fstab on lovesong:

172.25.1.1:/home2 /home2 nfs defaults,noauto,user,exec,rw 0 0
topoi:/reiseroffsite /reiseroffsite nfs defaults,noauto,users,exec,rw 0 0


Can a reiserfs not be nfs-remote-mounted?

-- hendrik