[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Challenge-response mail filters considered harmful (by spammers)

> From ats@acm.org Sun Aug  3 22:34:48 2003
> Alan Connor <alanconnor@earthlink.net> writes:
> > The sig would look like this:
> >
> > --
> >   Please include this signature in any response to this mail. Thank You.
> >
> >   030303284857463625397654736322637485969437549596969685747
> That would be a bad implementation.  First, that's not a valid
> signature delimiter.  Second, if it were, many MUAs strip off
> signatures automatically in quoted replies.

My mistake. I was exhausted. It goes at the top. 

It is easy to use formail to generate a unique message ID...Do you think
it would be practical to use these instead? I don't know whether they
would be stripped or not. You have the option of using the Message-ID
header, or the Resent-Message-ID header...


      For Linux/Bash users: Eliminate spam with the Mailbox-Sentry-Program. 
         See: http://tinyurl.com/inpd  for the scripts and docs.

Reply to: