Re: Can't Keep Kernel Log Messages From Console
> From cjwatson@debian.org Mon Jul 28 20:12:58 2003
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 03:13:08PM -0700, Alan Connor wrote:
> > > From bcwhite@precidia.com Mon Jul 28 15:09:43 2003
> > >
> > >
> > > This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> > > --------------8222A093BEB3CE9D0AF16851
> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> > > --------------8222A093BEB3CE9D0AF16851
> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii;
> > > name="syslog.conf"
> > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> > > Content-Disposition: inline;
> > > filename="syslog.conf"
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --------------8222A093BEB3CE9D0AF16851--
> >
> > Would someone PLEASE tell me what all that CRAP is, and how to get rid
> > of it?
>
> How have you managed to break mutt to the point where it doesn't
> understand attachments? I'm awed; mutt is an excellent MIME client.
> Maybe chapter 5 of the mutt manual would be helpful?
>
> --
> Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
>
>
And pray tell just what are attachments doing on Usenet?
The answer is that they aren't, are they?
So the question should be: "Since when does *slrn* deal with attachments?"
Which doesn't make a lot of sense.
Kindly direct your sarcasm where it belongs.
There are enough clues in my posts indicating that I read the newsfeed rather
than subscribe to the list directly.
*I* am cognizant of the fact that my posts are going to a mailing list as
well as Usenet, and take this into account.
It seems to me that others should do the same.
Not-to-mention that sending attachments is verboten on every mailing list that
I have ever subscribed to, as are HTML mails.
Henceforth I will simply killfile anyone on the list who does either.
Fortunately, the vast majority have better manners/sense than that.
Alan
--
For Linux/Bash users: Eliminate spam from your life
with the Mailbox-Sentry-Program. See the thread
MSP on comp.mail.misc for the latest version.
Reply to: