also sprach Mike Fedyk <firstname.lastname@example.org> [2003.07.15.2304 +0200]: > Unfortunately, what they are doing to keep the possibility of the > US government trying to take action against them, has caused the > mainline kernel developers to refuse to include their work in the > mainline kernel. I haven't followed this at all. Is there a comprehensive link? > I'm going to be using freeswan for a while also, but I'm going to > be helping to test 2.6-test ipsec to make sure it will be useful > at 2.6.0. :) Of course I will do the same. I am interested in using "native" stuff whereever possible. However, primarily I need functionality, and FreeS/WAN has been providing that. I will and am already testing 2.6 IPsec on test boxes, what I meant is that it will take a while before I entrust my infrastructure to it. PS: Please respect Mail-Followup-To. I don't want CCs on mailing list posts. -- Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them! .''`. martin f. krafft <email@example.com> : :' : proud Debian developer, admin, and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
Description: PGP signature