also sprach Noah L. Meyerhans <email@example.com> [2003.07.13.1935 +0200]: > Yeah, I'm not too happy about how freeswan is handled right now, either. I just talked to Rene. the 1.99 to 2.0 switch requires a rewrite of the kernel-patch. Thus it will take a little longer. But there will be a kernel patch. Thanks, Rene! > Fortunately we won't need freeswan anymore, once Linux 2.6 is out > (or if you want to use linux 2.5). But still, I thought the old > freeswan packages worked very well, and the new changes do seem to > sacrifice some of the package's usefulness to me. I am not going to convert to 2.6 immediately, nor will I trust its IPsec implementation from day one. Thus I am happy to use FreeS/WAN for another year or more. Aside, I like FreeS/WAN! -- Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them! .''`. martin f. krafft <firstname.lastname@example.org> : :' : proud Debian developer, admin, and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
Description: PGP signature