Re: kernel 2.2.x or 2.4.x ?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: kernel 2.2.x or 2.4.x ?
From: Nicos Gollan <gtdev@spearhead.de>
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2003 22:20:57 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 200307062220.57955.gtdev@spearhead.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 5.1.1.6.0.20030706210622.00ada5c0@pop3.uk.worldonline.com>
References: <5.1.1.6.0.20030706201915.00ad3dd0@pop3.uk.worldonline.com> <[🔎] 5.1.1.6.0.20030706210622.00ada5c0@pop3.uk.worldonline.com>

On Sunday 06 July 2003 22:12, Shango Oluwa wrote:
> Why, if 2.4.x is more recent & secure, is my Debian 3 (woody) CD
> distribution built with kernel 2.2.20 ?

Mostly because the 2.4 series had some serious (as in "don't use for 
production machines") problems when Woody was locked.

-- 
Got Backup?

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: kernel 2.2.x or 2.4.x ?
  - From: Shango Oluwa <debw@wenzani.worldonline.co.uk>

References:
- kernel 2.2.x or 2.4.x ?
  - From: Shango Oluwa <debw@wenzani.worldonline.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Re : Atapi CD-Writer!
Next by Date: support in SANE for UMAX Astra 3400U
Previous by thread: kernel 2.2.x or 2.4.x ?
Next by thread: Re: kernel 2.2.x or 2.4.x ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread