kernel 2.2.x or 2.4.x ?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: kernel 2.2.x or 2.4.x ?
From: Shango Oluwa <debw@wenzani.worldonline.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2003 21:12:42 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 5.1.1.6.0.20030706210622.00ada5c0@pop3.uk.worldonline.com>
In-reply-to: <20030706191637.4A4A41F868@murphy.debian.org>
References: <5.1.1.6.0.20030706201915.00ad3dd0@pop3.uk.worldonline.com> <E19ZEzI-0003N5-00@master.debian.org> <E19ZEzI-0003N5-00@master.debian.org> <5.1.1.6.0.20030706201915.00ad3dd0@pop3.uk.worldonline.com>

Greetings all,

I have been thinking deep thoughts about this:

Why, if 2.4.x is more recent & secure, is my Debian 3 (woody) CD distribution
built with kernel 2.2.20 ?

I am a new user and this might be a naive question, but why?

why?
Shango

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.489 / Virus Database: 288 - Release Date: 10/06/2003

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: kernel 2.2.x or 2.4.x ?
  - From: Nicos Gollan <gtdev@spearhead.de>
- Re: kernel 2.2.x or 2.4.x ?
  - From: aradorlinux@yahoo.es
- Re: kernel 2.2.x or 2.4.x ?
  - From: Paul Johnson <baloo@ursine.ca>
- Re: kernel 2.2.x or 2.4.x ?
  - From: Shyamal Prasad <shyamal.prasad@sbcglobal.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Help with an error message
Next by Date: Re : Atapi CD-Writer!
Previous by thread: bounced mail & mailing lists ???
Next by thread: Re: kernel 2.2.x or 2.4.x ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread