Re: kernel 2.2.x or 2.4.x ?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: kernel 2.2.x or 2.4.x ?
From: Shango Oluwa <debw@wenzani.worldonline.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2003 22:18:55 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 5.1.1.6.0.20030706220958.00ab8410@pop3.uk.worldonline.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 200307062220.57955.gtdev@spearhead.de>
References: <[🔎] 5.1.1.6.0.20030706210622.00ada5c0@pop3.uk.worldonline.com> <5.1.1.6.0.20030706201915.00ad3dd0@pop3.uk.worldonline.com> <[🔎] 5.1.1.6.0.20030706210622.00ada5c0@pop3.uk.worldonline.com>


Nicos wrote:

Mostly because the 2.4 series had some serious (as in "don't use for
production machines") problems when Woody was locked.


Understood.

Is kernel 2.4.21 considered safe for a production machine now?
I'm configuring an internet router and have been advised to use 2.4.21
 - I have also considered LRP but that distribution seems to be
crumbling and unsupported : my main concern is security and I am
prepared to stretch my brain to achieve this.

Any comments welcome.


Shango.

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.489 / Virus Database: 288 - Release Date: 10/06/2003

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: kernel 2.2.x or 2.4.x ?
  - From: Nicos Gollan <gtdev@spearhead.de>

References:
- kernel 2.2.x or 2.4.x ?
  - From: Shango Oluwa <debw@wenzani.worldonline.co.uk>
- Re: kernel 2.2.x or 2.4.x ?
  - From: Nicos Gollan <gtdev@spearhead.de>

Prev by Date: Re: can't ping lan
Next by Date: Re: esd 0.2.23 remote play on debian unstable
Previous by thread: Re: kernel 2.2.x or 2.4.x ?
Next by thread: Re: kernel 2.2.x or 2.4.x ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread