[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: OT: Malformed date header? (was: Re: Re: Kernel penguin logo?)



On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 06:14:26PM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> on Wed, Dec 31, 1969 at 11:59:59PM +0000, Benedict Verheyen (linux4bene@pandora.be) wrote:
> 
> The webmail service you're using is creating the following 
> 
>     Date: Thu 12 Jun 2003 13:32:37 +0200
> 
> This is missing the ',' following 'Thu'.  Result is that your mail
> appears to have been sent on Dec 31, 1969 (one day prior to the epoch).
> 
> I'm curious as to whether this is a bug with your mail service, or mutt.

mutt (1.3.28-2.2 from stable) doesn't get that confused for me, so I
suppose it might be a wishlist bug in mutt. However, RFC 2822 requires
the comma, so it is most definitely a bug in the mail service in
question, and the mutt developers might simply have decided to be more
strict at some point.

Cheers,

-- 
Colin Watson                                  [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]



Reply to: