Re: apt-get upgrade advice
On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 01:12:57PM +0100, Richard Kimber wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Jun 2003 01:29:09 -0400
> Graeme Tank <email@example.com> wrote:
> > I'm using testing:
> > $ dpkg -l binutils
> > ii binutils 126.96.36.199.4-0.1 The GNU assembler, linker ...
> > and bug #188900 seems fixed.
> Thanks. But this morning listbugs still says it's open. There isn't much
> point in having this facility if it doesn't report the true position.
> - Richard.
Sorry for not being clearer, Richard. The bug is in binutils
188.8.131.52.18-1.6, but was fixed in 184.108.40.206.18-1.7 some 2 months ago.
>From the changelog in the testing version (220.127.116.11.4-0.1) cited
binutils (18.104.22.168.18-1.7) unstable; urgency=high
* Fixed ld segv (replaced yy_current_buffer by YY_CURRENT_BUFFER)
(Closes: #188876, 188900, 188912)
-- Julien LEMOINE <firstname.lastname@example.org> Mon, 14 Apr 2003 04:45:03 +0200
The stable binutils (22.214.171.124.1-4) does not suffer this bug.