On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 23:48:47 +0300 Aryan Ameri <a.ameri@linuxiran.org> wrote: > If the intended users of the script are likely to use different Unix > versions, then sh scripting is probably the safe bet. On the other > hand, if you are counting on them, running your script on Windows or > traditional Macintosh, then perl is a safer bet. This is not the first time I've seen this said and I am curious where, exactly, an sh script would be more portable than a perl script? -- Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | main connection to the switchboard of souls. | -- Lenny Nero - Strange Days -------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Attachment:
pgpDSwN7E_Tez.pgp
Description: PGP signature