Re: Good Open Source Web Development software
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 02:10:45AM -0400, lists1 wrote:
> It works heavily toward w3c standard compliant code (and if you look at the
> top 100 sites, I doubt 10% of them are 100% standards compliant, and if you
> have 100% standards compliant, you'll be excluding over 90% of the browser
> users on the internet).
No you wouldn't, because all the browsers out can decently render a
100% compliant page. I've yet to find a browser that can't.
> I read a while back that Amaya development/updating wasn't very
> rapid.
It supports the current standard. People who make the complaint that
it doesn't get rapid development don't realize that people don't mess
with a UI that just works. It kind of reminds me of the old Windows
program HoTMetaL.
> If you haven't worked in a production environment with a wysiwyg editor, you
> can't appreciate the type of rapid development that you can do with such an
> editor. Yes it screws up the code. And fixing the code under frontpage was
> a nightmare, but it was still faster than hand editing.
Unless you have macros.
- --
.''`. Baloo Ursidae <baloo@ursine.ca>
: :' : proud Debian admin and user
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fix a system
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+5ZnfJ5vLSqVpK2kRAlBrAJ40xsH5Kq5NL0ilqCp/2lkxfsvPagCdGhqM
DueLhBaZ+Oxy3Aec1owpN+k=
=GEpu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: