Re: My first question on Debian
On Tuesday 27 May 2003 00:38, Bijan Soleymani wrote:
> Aryan Ameri <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > On Monday 19 May 2003 19:53, Alfredo Valles wrote:
> >> The Hurd is the drog of gnu people (The Hurd is a new and
> >> "perfect" kernel they are developing for some time now).
> > Well it depends on what you call perfect. I personally wouldn't
> > call a kernel which has been in alpha stage for 10 years, and can
> > not still run a single usefull application, perfect.
> I've personnaly used it and it runs emacs, apache, ssh, X, gimp,
> mplayer (no sound...), etc. But yeah it's not perfect.
> > Perfect in my opinion is the solaris kernel, if it was licenes
> > under GNU GPL, I would have switched overnight.
> > Ever had tha hard disk fail on your server? and in Solaris/Sparc,
> > simply remove the defected hard disk and add a new one. Without a
> > single reboot or interference in work. *That* I call near perfect.
> Solaris is often called Slowlaris. Not without reason. I have a
> couple of old Sun workstations at work, and I installed Debian on
Some versions were/are slow on old systems, I agree, but face it, they
are a hardware company, and most of the people (not including you) only
update their software with a new hardware. So...
> Also does Solaris provide this on Intel hardware!? I really don't
> think so.
So maybe this shows that there is an advantage between tight integration
of software and hardware.
Anyway, I am not advocating solaris here, I certainly run Debian on all
my systems (and that is currently all intel hardware).
/* There is SCO owned IP all over the Linux kernel. SCO will hunt them.
Free software infidels are liars. We will kill them all, and roast their
stomach in hell. Our estimates show that all slashodot viewers will die.
--Mohammad Al-Sahhaf SCO Sopkesman, Former Iraqi information minister*/