On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 03:41:11PM -0700, nate wrote: > as for make-kpkg, not sure specifically but as long as the gcc binary > points to gcc-2.95 it should use that version. maybe update-alternatives > can help here, [...] gcc is deliberately not managed by alternatives. Cheers, -- Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]