Ugly fonts in Mozilla
OK, I don't know exactly what is going on here....
I had Mozilla running for a very long time with some pretty decent fonts and
font sizes.
I log in today after a shutdown (happens periodically) and now I have only
these really ugly fonts available under Mozilla. And under a number of other
applications as well: X-chat, gaim. Slightly buggered under BlueFish
OpenOffice and Emacs and all terminal windows are unaffected.
I've not clue where to even begin looking for these font problems.
But I'm not clueless, per se.
Maybe someone can see a problem with the font packages?
bash-2.05b$ dpkg -l *font* | grep ii
ii cmatrix-xfont 1.1b-5 X11 font for Console Matrix
ii fontconfig 2.2.0-1 generic font configuration library
ii fonty 1.0-12 Fonts on Linux console.
ii freefont 0.10-11 Freeware font selection for X11
ii gsfonts 6.0-2.1 Fonts for the ghostscript interpreter
ii gsfonts-other 6.0-3 Additional fonts for the ghostscript interpr
ii gsfonts-x11 0.17 Make Ghostscript fonts available to X11
ii gtkfontsel 1.1-6 A gtk+ based font selection utility
ii libfontconfig1 2.2.0-1 generic font configuration library (shared l
ii ltsp-x-fonts-i 3.0.0-0 X fonts for the Linux Terminal Server Projec
ii msttcorefonts 1.1.2 Installer for Microsoft TrueType core fonts
ii psfontmgr 0.11.1 PostScript font manager -- part of Defoma, D
ii unifont 1.0-1 X11 dual-width GNU unicode font
ii x-ttcidfont-co 13 Configure TrueType and CID fonts for X.
ii xfonts-100dpi 4.2.1-6 100 dpi fonts for X
ii xfonts-100dpi- 4.2.1-6 100 dpi fonts for X (transcoded from ISO 106
ii xfonts-75dpi 4.2.1-6 75 dpi fonts for X
ii xfonts-75dpi-t 4.2.1-6 75 dpi fonts for X (transcoded from ISO 1064
ii xfonts-abi 1.0.2+cvs.2002 Some fonts shipped with AbiWord
ii xfonts-base 4.2.1-6 standard fonts for X
ii xfonts-base-tr 4.2.1-6 standard fonts for X (transcoded from ISO 10
ii xfonts-scalabl 4.2.1-6 scalable fonts for X
ii xfonts-scalabl 4.2.0-2 non-free Type1 and TrueType fonts from XFree
--
Nothing matters very much, and few things matter at all.
-- Arthur Balfour
Reply to: