on Fri, 02 May 2003 04:40:31PM -0700, Paul Johnson insinuated:
> On Fri, May 02, 2003 at 12:52:08PM -0400, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
> > > Don't do this, since it's not impossible that non-spam ends up
> > > in your spam folder. This method is very likely to pollute your
> > > filter.
> >
> > nope -- i have to acknowledge that it's spam first, by un-newing
> > it.
>
> Well, I don't see how that's different, since closing the folder
> un-"new"-s all messages in that folder, they all become "old".
i use mutt with maildirs -- perhaps i should have clarified earlier.
if i read a message, the 'N' in front of it goes away, which means
that it has been moved from folder/new to folder/cur. closing the
folder has no effect whatsoever on the status of a message.
</nori>
--
.~. nori @ sccs.swarthmore.edu
/V\ http://www.sccs.swarthmore.edu/~nori/jnl/
// \\ @ maenad.net
/( )\ www.maenad.net
^`~'^
get my (*new*) key here:
http://www.maenad.net/geek/gpg/7ede5499.asc
(please *remove* old key 11e031f1!)
Attachment:
pgpJZJp85nQ1b.pgp
Description: PGP signature