On Tue, 2003-04-29 at 23:38, Mark Roach wrote: > I think that two years is a perfectly reasonable amount of time between > stable versions. > > I think that the difference in opinion is the difference between > "enthusiasts" who enjoy constantly upgrading to the bleeding edge and > admins who want a stable and consistent platform across their systems. > What's about the FreeBSD way? I think that's a better way to manage a distribution. Ported applications and basic o.s. follow different idea for "stable". So ports are upgraded with very fast rate and o.s. is more and more slow. Bye -- Stefano <stefano.ceci@aruba.it>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part