On Mon, 2003-04-07 at 22:09, Travis Crump wrote: > Most of the g++ libraries built with g++-3.2 have package names ending > in c102. I have found this to be not true. libwxgtk2.4 for example was compiled with gcc-3.2. On the other hand xerces seems to have the c102 extension. > It shouldn't matter if something was compiled with gcc-2.95 vs > gcc-3.2 as far as I understand it. I found that I couldn't link an application which was compiled with g++-2.95 with libraries compiled with g++-3.2 Some of the functions linked but most didn't. This might be because it was c++ though - c might transition better. Thanks for you time though - its appreciated. Shri -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Shri Shrikumar U R Byte Solutions I.T. Consultant Edinburgh, Scotland Tel: 0845 644 4745 Email: shri@urbyte.com Web: www.urbyte.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part