Re: SE Linux vs. RSBAC (was Re: have I been rooted?)
On Sat, Mar 22, 2003 at 06:28:16PM -0500, Fraser Campbell wrote:
> Hmmm, that's almost the opposite of what they say (see
> http://www.trusteddebian.org/rsbac.html):
It would appear (to me at least) that a number of criticisms that have
against SE-Linux are entirely false, very suspect, currently being fixed
or outside the scope of SE-Linux and can already be done with other
kernel patches (eg. ACL support). I wont give details here, unless
people really want me to...
On access virus scanning is something that makes me nervous. Perhaps
this is an irrational fear. In any case, clamd would appear to use
dazuko, not RSBAC to do this <URL:http://www.dazuko.org/>. Is there
any relationship between dazuko and RSBAC?
There might be some geniune claims here, but they get lost in
the noise.
Also see <URL:http://www.rsbac.org/>.
--
Brian May <bam@snoopy.apana.org.au>
Reply to: