[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Unstable/Java/Mozilla



There is blackdown java compiled with gcc3.2 - but there is no debian
package AFAIK and that should solve the problem.

ftp://ftp.mirror.ac.uk/sites/ftp.blackdown.org/java-linux/
JDK-1.4.1/i386/01/j2re-1.4.1-01-linux-i586-gcc3.2.bin

ftp://ftp.mirror.ac.uk/sites/ftp.blackdown.org/java-linux/
JDK-1.4.1/i386/01/j2sdk-1.4.1-01-linux-i586-gcc3.2.bin

Now from my previous experience, if you use update-alternative command
you can set java and javac but my question is haw do you inform the
system that you do _have_ an JRE otherwise is trying to intall
kaffe,etc ?


On Sun, 16 Mar 2003, Rob Weir wrote :

» Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 17:11:31 +1100
» From: Rob Weir <rweir@ertius.org>
» To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
» Subject: Re: Unstable/Java/Mozilla
»
» On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 05:19:28PM -0700, Gary Hennigan wrote:
» > I just realized that due to the fact that Mozilla, and it's
» > descendents, in unstable, is now being built with the 3.2 compilers
» > I'm stuck without a useable Java plugin. Anyone have a solution to
» > this? I've been using the 1.4 *.debs from Blackdown, but those appear
» > to have been compiled with 2.9x compilers and so I'm getting
» > unresolved symbols when I try to load up pages that require the Java
» > plugin, and Galeon crashes
» >
» > There's a "resolved" bug filed against Mozilla which seems to indicate
» > that the maintainer doesn't consider it a problem.
» >
» > Any word on a Java2 JDK being compiled with 3.2 compilers?
»
» I was almost certain it had been rebuilt just after gcc 3.2 became the
» default compiler in sid.  Are you sure you're up to date?
»



Reply to: