Re: libc6: did it move from unstable to testing?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Also sprach Craig Dickson (Sun 09 Mar 02003 at 02:11:51AM -0800):
> Michael D. Schleif wrote:
>
> > What am I missing?
> >
> > # apt-cache policy libc6
> > libc6:
> > Installed: 2.2.5-14.3
> > Candidate: 2.2.5-14.3
> > Version Table:
> > *** 2.2.5-14.3 0
> > 500 ftp://ftp.debian.org testing/main Packages
> > 500 ftp://ftp.us.debian.org testing/main Packages
> > 500 http://debian.crosslink.net testing/main Packages
> > 500 http://http.us.debian.org testing/main Packages
> > 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
>
> Have you done an "apt-get update" today? Even if you have, try it again,
> then try "apt-cache policy libc6" again and see if it's any different. I
> don't know what else could have us showing different information about
> the same repository.
Yes, of course -- my last update must have been just the other side of
this transition . . .
- --
Best Regards,
mds
mds resource
888.250.3987
- -
Dare to fix things before they break . . .
- -
Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much
we think we know. The more I know, the more I know I don't know . . .
- --
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+a1x3LUOEaCtUQpwRAigUAJ463F73UnKB2pL/PkSlFtd0W8+88ACfYoty
ht+e3Wc1GQ5Ns2bENQN+JrI=
=VfjE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: