Re: [OT] Complaint
* Joseph A Nagy Jr <joseph_a_nagy_jr@charter.net> [030228 14:21]:
> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >--text follows this line--
> >
> >>>>>>In article <[🔎] 3E5DA55B.1070900@charter.net>, Joseph A Nagy Jr
> >>>>>><joseph_a_nagy_jr@charter.net> writes:
> >
> >
> > > Actually, that Reply-to-list functionality can be implimented on
> > > the list itself.
> >
> > Not without breaking the original functionality of Reply to
>
> I don't agree. I think when you hit reply to, it should reply back to
> where the message originated from (in the case of mailing lists, I
> should be replying to the list, not the individual to first propogate
> the message).
Hmm? I agree that "reply to" should reply back to the origin of the
email. However the list is _not_ the origin of the email! The original
sender is the origin by definition.
Nick.
--
Debian testing/unstable
Linux onefish 2.4.20-lavienx #1 Mon Jan 6 17:03:01 JST 2003
i686 unknown unknown GNU/Linux
Reply to: