Re: spamassassin - three basic questions
On February 21, 2003 05:26 pm, Levi Waldron wrote:
> that using spamd would be so much faster. I could switch to fetchmail for
> the sake of spamd, although reading through the documentation I see that
> the spamc daemon could also improve my performance without changing my mail
> setup at all. I'll give that a try first, and report back...
Minor correction: spamc is a command-line client for spamd. Calling spamc
does in fact work much, much faster than calling spamassassin (a small
fraction of a second instead of 5-10s).
Reply to: