Re: TLS client
On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 20:24, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 07:03:46AM -0600, Craig Jackson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 02:11, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
> > > El Jueves, 13 de Febrero de 2003 15:32, Rob Weir escribió:
> > > > >
> > > > > You don't need unstable to use TLS with evolution or Kmail. I used
> > > > > evolution and now I use Kmail (kde 3.1), both with stable.
> > > >
> > > > I dunno about evolution with TLS support, but kmail 3.1 certainly isn't
> > > > in stable.
> > >
> > > Yes, you are right. I meant that I have woody (stable) with kde 3.1,
> > > installed (.deb) from kde. And the evolution I tried I think it was the
> > > evolution from woody.
> > >
> >
> > The Evolution/stable that installs from Woody does not suppot TLS. I
> > worked through all of those dependency issues last night and was able to
> > install Evolution/unstable which does support TLS. All I can say is
> > "Praise Debian" because it would have been a nightmare trying to juggle
> > all of those RPMs under Redhat. Problem solved.
>
> Two other possible solutions:
> * is there a evolution-(tls|ssl) package in non-US/main?
> * go read up on 'apt-get source'; it makes it fairly simple to rebuild
> packages from sid on woody and sarge systems, which save you having to
> update your libraries and such (you're effectively running sid at the
> moment).
Thanks, but I took care the dependencies one by one. It was not hard and
took about 20 minutes, but I would not have wanted to do that on a
number of work stations, as easy as apt-get made it. RPM would have been
impossible.
--
Craig Jackson <cjackson@localsurface.com>
Reply to: