On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 10:55:50PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Hugh Saunders <hugh@wacka.mjr.org> [2002.12.06.0002 +0100]: > > Is it adviseable to attempt to use these measures to be removed from > > lists? or just keep on writing filitering rules? > > no. yes. in that order. > > we should start filing suits against spammers. anyone know which > countries in the world have proper laws that allow e.g. the provider > to be sued unless they can prove and delegate the guilt to the > spammer? > > -- > .''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org> > : :' : proud Debian developer, admin, and user > `. `'` > `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system > > NOTE: The public PGP keyservers are broken! > Get my key here: http://people.debian.org/~madduck/gpg/330c4a75.asc If I am not mistaken, Sweden has a law that prohibits "unsolicited commercial email" a.k.a. spam. I am not fully aware of how the law is written, but if any swedes out there can give some more inf, I am sure it would be appreciated by all of us. -- Best Regards Nicolaus Kedegren Our business in life is not to succeed but to continue to fail in high spirits. -- Robert Louis Stevenson
Attachment:
pgpsmSRNWOBlh.pgp
Description: PGP signature