On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 13:24, Pigeon wrote: > On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 06:56:44PM -0800, alan brown wrote: > > > Modes "1024*768" > > Try: 1024x768 (My own file has 800x600) > > "Barely usable"? 800x600 on a 21" screen sounds great to me! :-) > > Pigeon Reminds me of the system that I got at a graphics design job for a financial services company, before they started weaning themselves off 3270-type terminals to PCs: 19" monitor with 640x480 16 colours. I switched it up to 800x600 16 colours (it was a high end, quarter of a meg graphics card) and four years later went to 1024x768 16 colours when I brought in my half meg card from my home machine after putting a *whole* meg video card. And they wondered why I recommended a four meg card when the system was finally replaced after seven years... -- Mark L. Kahnt, FLMI/M, ALHC, HIA, AIAA, ACS, MHP ML Kahnt New Markets Consulting Tel: (613) 531-8684 / (613) 539-0935 Email: kahnt@hosehead.dyndns.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part