Re: depmod and multi kernel systems

To: grandmother@telia.com, debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: depmod and multi kernel systems
From: Johan Ehnberg <johan@ehnberg.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 19:39:24 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 3DD13CCC.20409@ehnberg.net>
References: <[🔎] 3DD143B2.7104.36A86C@localhost>

And a second question. Is there any arguments for using ext2instead of ext3? Cause I can't find any that would make anyonechoose ext2 instead of ext3, and still Debian 3.0 installs on ext2.

I guess ext3 is getting mature in 2.4 kernels. Accordingly, ext3 can beused using the bf2.4 flavor when installing Woody.

I see two reasons to use ext2 instead of ext3:
-Ext2 is more mature
-Ext3 uses up space for its journal
On the other hand
-Ext3's journal kicks butt.

Cheers,
Johan

--
Johan Ehnberg
johan@ehnberg.net
"Windows? No... I don't think so."

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: depmod and multi kernel systems
  - From: Jeff <jcoppock1@attbi.com>

References:
- depmod and multi kernel systems
  - From: grandmother@telia.com

Prev by Date: Re: true-type and wine
Next by Date: [OT] Practical differences between Netgear models
Previous by thread: depmod and multi kernel systems
Next by thread: Re: depmod and multi kernel systems
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread