On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 10:53:51AM +0200, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote: > I don't think that it is very bad advice, but I have a different > reason for wanting a virus scanner. I have no Windows machines, so > I'm not worried about getting infected, but those ms viruses cause a > lot of hassle, and they steal a lot of bandwidth. The amount of > bandwidth is significant for the workstations that hasn't got a > thick pipe. So, I'd like a scanner on my mail server that is able to > label it as such. So I can filter it out on the server, make a > POP-filter or whatever. You do realise having your own mail server scanning for viruses still uses your bandwidth to recieve the messages before they're scanned, right? -- Baloo
Attachment:
pgpvUs_jGpWc8.pgp
Description: PGP signature