Re: jigdo question
On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 06:30:02PM -0700, Jaye Inabnit ke6sls wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Friday 13 September 2002 10:13 am, Gary Hennigan wrote:
> > I'm trying to get Jigdo to create the 1st NON-US woody CD and in the
> > end it keeps bombing with:
> >
> > ============
> > Aaargh - 2 files could not be downloaded. This should not
> > happen! Depending on the problem, it may help to retry downloading
> > the missing files.
> > Also, you could try changing to another Debian or Non-US server,
> > in case the one you used is out of sync.
> >
> > However, if all the files downloaded without errors and you
> > still get this message, it means that the files changed on the
> > server, so the image cannot be generated.
> > As a last resort, you could try to complete the CD image download
> > by fetching the remaining data with rsync.
> >
> > Press Return to retry downloading the missing files.
> > Press Ctrl-C to abort. (If you re-run jigdo-lite later, it will
> > resume from here, the downloaded data is not lost if you press
> > Ctrl-C now.)
> > ============
> >
> > No matter how many times I retry or which of a couple of mirrors I
> > select I always get this message. How can I tell which two files it
> > needs?
> >
> > I'm using the standard Jigdo server and file, I think, ie.,
> >
> > http://us.cdimage.debian.org/jigdo-area/current/jigdo/i386/woody-i386-1.NON
> >US.jigdo
> >
> > Any ideas?
> >
> > Gary
>
> Greetings Gary:
>
> I used jigdo to pull the full seven cd set down two weeks ago without
> problems. Looking at that error makes me think that you might just want to
> wait twenty four hours and try again. That should ge enough time for the new
> files to sync on the servers.
>
> gl
>
> - --
>
> Jaye Inabnit\ARS ke6sls\/A GNU-Debian linux user\/ http://www.qsl.net/ke6sls
> If it's stupid, but works, it ain't stupid. I SHOUT JUST FOR FUN.
> Free software, in a free world, for a free spirit. Please Support freedom!
I built the image today with jigdo, no problems.
Bob
Reply to: