[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Can ldso be removed or does deborphan have a bug?



On Tue, 30 Jul 2002 20:04:39 +0100
"Colin Watson" <cjwatson@debian.org> wrote:

> That was the case for potato. For woody and above, libc6 no longer needs
> ldso, so you only need it if you have older programs that depend on
> libc4 or libc5.

Ah, I just did a quick grep filtering of dpkg's available file for
packages that required ldso.

-- 
Jamin W. Collins



Reply to: