Re: Can ldso be removed or does deborphan have a bug?
On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 07:23:20AM -0500, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jul 2002 14:11:38 +0200
> Johann Spies <jspies@sun.ac.za> wrote:
[...]
> > deborphan 1.2-2 on sarge
>
> Well, you got any of these installed? They appear to be the only ones
> that depend on it from my quick check. I would suspect that you have
> either libc5 or libc6 installed at least, but if you don't have any of
> these, there would be nothing listing a dependancy that I can see. So,
> deborphan would be correct as far as I can tell.
>
> Package: pump
> Package: nextawg
> Package: nextaw
> Package: libc5
> Package: libc6
[...]
That was the case for potato. For woody and above, libc6 no longer needs
ldso, so you only need it if you have older programs that depend on
libc4 or libc5.
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
Reply to: