Re: Can ldso be removed or does deborphan have a bug?
On Tue, 30 Jul 2002 14:11:38 +0200
Johann Spies <jspies@sun.ac.za> wrote:
> I am suspicious about this:
>
> $ deborphan
> libarts
> libgd-gif1
> libcompress-zlib-perl
> ldso
> ^^^^ Can this be trusted?
>
>
> deborphan 1.2-2 on sarge
Well, you got any of these installed? They appear to be the only ones
that depend on it from my quick check. I would suspect that you have
either libc5 or libc6 installed at least, but if you don't have any of
these, there would be nothing listing a dependancy that I can see. So,
deborphan would be correct as far as I can tell.
Package: pump
Package: nextawg
Package: nextaw
Package: libc5
Package: libc6
Package: ldso
Package: netscape-base-4-libc5
Package: xaw95g
Package: navigator-smotif-475-libc5
Package: libdl1-altdev
Package: libsafe
Package: libc6-dev
Package: xaw3d
Package: communicator-smotif-475-libc5
--
Jamin W. Collins
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: