on Sun, 28 Jul 2002 04:50:36AM +0000, Thatcher Ulrich insinuated: > * Richard Cobbe <cobbe@airmail.net>: > > > > So, we've got a complicated, ill-designed language, implemented > > by folks who are more swayed by hype than by solid technical and > > logical reasoning. Sounds like a winner to me! (<sound of > > Richard retching in the corner>) > > And yet, Perl is wildly successful. Maybe Perl's design choices > aren't so misguided? woah, linguistic completeness != success of a programming language! in fact, the opposite case could perhaps be argued better than the positive. personally, i love perl, i just don't think what Wall alleges about its parallels to natural language mean much. </nori> -- .~. nori @ sccs.swarthmore.edu /V\ http://www.sccs.swarthmore.edu/~nori/jnl/daily.html // \\ @ maenad.net /( )\ www.maenad.net ^`~'^
Attachment:
pgpwBap6Aq9BX.pgp
Description: PGP signature