Re: Too stupid for courier-imap, but uw-imapd works?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Too stupid for courier-imap, but uw-imapd works?
From: Mario Vukelic <mario.vukelic@dantian.org>
Date: 05 Jul 2002 21:11:11 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 1025896272.4046.22.camel@sonic>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] slrnaibqfd.kh6.lunz@stoli.localnet>
References: <[🔎] 1025814116.3211.22.camel@sonic> <[🔎] slrnai9hbc.mmd.lunz@orr.homenet> <[🔎] 1025891089.4046.6.camel@sonic> <[🔎] slrnaibqfd.kh6.lunz@stoli.localnet>

On Fri, 2002-07-05 at 20:47, Jason Lunz wrote:

(lots)

Thanks yet again



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- Too stupid for courier-imap, but uw-imapd works?
  - From: Mario Vukelic <mario.vukelic@dantian.org>
- Re: Too stupid for courier-imap, but uw-imapd works?
  - From: Jason Lunz <lunz@falooley.org>
- Re: Too stupid for courier-imap, but uw-imapd works?
  - From: Mario Vukelic <mario.vukelic@dantian.org>
- Re: Too stupid for courier-imap, but uw-imapd works?
  - From: Jason Lunz <lunz@falooley.org>

Prev by Date: Re: "NFS Slave"??
Next by Date: Do I want NFS in the kernel?
Previous by thread: Re: Too stupid for courier-imap, but uw-imapd works?
Next by thread: Re: Too stupid for courier-imap, but uw-imapd works?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread