Re: kernel upgrade to 2.4.18 [Solved]
>>"Paul" == Paul E Condon <pecondon@quiknet.com> writes:
Paul> On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 08:59:32AM -0400, Andrew Perrin wrote:
>>
>> No, you do not need such a link. It works fine to compile in
>> /usr/src/kernel-sources-2.4.18. If you prefer to compile in /usr/src/linux
>> then you need the link. If you prefer to compile in /usr/src/disneyland
>> then you need a symlink there.
>>
Paul> To expand on my earlier post: Some module selections require
Paul> the link.
Which modules are these?
Paul> I think it would be a useful addition to make-kpkg to have it
Paul> put in this link. It costs very little in computer resources,
Paul> and it saves some users from an initial failed kernel build.
I would prefer finding and fixing the real problem, and not
put bandaids in my packages to work around breakages elsewhere.
manoj
--
"The average man, who does not know what to do with his life, wants
another one which will last forever." Anatole France
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: