Re: Update shouldn't nuke XF86Config-4
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 01:28:04PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Paul Sargent wrote:
> > I'm just glad backups are always made before debconf writes to files.
>
> Yes, /var/cache/debconf/*-old are handy.
>
> What, you mean config files? Debconf does not ever, ever, write to
> config files. Ill-designed maintainer scripts might. I wish people could
> get their terminology right; accusing debconf of writing to a config
> file is akin to accusing readline of writing to a config file.
...
LOL :)
Well I think you should have blamed "mv" command and "install" command
for the crime committed.
--
~\^o^/~~~ ~\^.^/~~~ ~\^*^/~~~ ~\^_^/~~~ ~\^+^/~~~ ~\^:^/~~~ ~\^v^/~~~ +++++
Osamu Aoki <debian@aokiconsulting.com>, GnuPG-key: 1024D/D5DE453D
.
See "User's Guide": http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/users-guide/
See "Debian reference": http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/reference/
.
"Debian reference" Project at: http://qref.sf.net
.
I welcome your constructive criticisms and corrections.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: