Re: The latest round of antivirus bouncebacks
On Thu, 2002-04-11 at 00:35, ben wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 April 2002 11:54 pm, Simon Hepburn wrote:
> > ben wrote:
> > > thanks for the input. so, on attachments, none? some?
> >
> > If I'm helping people out with, say X problems for example, I'd far prefer
> > to see their config and log files as attachments rather than pasted, simply
> > beccause of the sheer length of them. Also a lot of files, for example
> > fstab, are just plain awkward to read when pasted and wrapped. And what
> > about gpg ? Attachments are pretty useful things on the whole, even if some
> > of them might contain things none of us are interested in .
>
> 1. no spam
>
> 2. text-only (no html, ms-tnef, etc.)
>
> 3. wrap text
>
> since i've not been done wrong by any attachment i've ever received, and no
> real objection to them exists as yet, what other conditions need apply? while
> the three above seem trivial, the purpose of this is to generate an advisory
> notice for new subscribers. what else shoud be on that list?
>
4. Spell check.
--
first impressions are bunk (unknown)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: